Transdisciplinar Ark project

Transdisciplinarity recognizes nature as a single undivided shell, where every object is individual (has its own control mechanisms, not only passive, but active and complex, non-mechanical) and an extension of nature itself, and for this reason it is equal and different from this same original nature, which means that the universe has emergent laws, is cyclical/has feedback but irreversible. Therefore, the division between the fields does not make sense. All fields must be able to describe the same phenomena as others, and our task is to analyze the possibilities of this being realized in modern sciences. The object of transdisciplinary Science is transdimensional: the human being is physical, chemical, anthropological, social and countless other things. Therefore, its activity goes beyond dichotomies, it is a science that articulates both actuality and virtuality, concreteness and abstraction, and therefore it is never conclusive.

The precondition for existing in space-time is to be complex: existence occurs on multiple scales, with infinite interactions around it with matter, space, time, radiation, mass, electromagnetism, etc., carrying "memories" in its physical body, subject to emergencies and therefore to universal turbulent patterns, organizing itself as a fractal, etc.

We consider that every interaction is an interrelation as part of a dynamic whole, and therefore, transdisciplinary science is reflective of itself, that is, it goes beyond the boundaries between philosophy and science, but also does not consider any experience as false, and therefore, includes all excluded, is a global, democratic and revolutionary project. It is a report that values the literary, poetic, pedagogical, situated or even banal description of life. It is for this very reason a social project, as it aims to transform all spheres of life, especially everyday life, much more utopian than the wavering corporate interdisciplinarity. It is therefore the height of creativity, freedom, self-determination, imagination, while at the same time recognizing its limitations to overcome: it is the artistic ideal applied in practice and the practice guiding the artistic ideal; We wouldn't be exaggerating if we called transdisciplinarity a big party without beginning or end. With unlimited connections, life has no foundation except in living. And this has universal meaning.

We seek to erase the distinctions between natural sciences and social sciences, as both influence each other, and I imagine this is according to philosophy. Thus, when we study mode relationships of analytical functions similar to the local/global pair, we are not talking about a result about the relationship between local and global in the analytical functions, but the relationship between local and global in general. What distinguishes the sciences is not their object, but their point of view and way of seeing objects and relationships. We consider Mathematics to be the preferable point of view to carry out this work (although all sciences are equivalent in potential, but Mathematics denotes something different from what it means for the mainstream (mathematics), being equivalent to Geography, Physics, Philosophy, etc.), because unlike philosophy, it can exemplify ideas and give formulas for all manipulations and uses of that idea. Our approach is purely content-oriented, which also allows us to put form in its proper place. With this approach, our focus will always be on the individual, on not neglecting all the non-included (or never-included, given that we believe we have new insights into science), which will later lead us to a very organic relationship with the universal. This will ensure that our theory has nothing external to itself, but is always an instrument of its own revitalization.

Studying something in its process of change, in all its phases and changes, from birth to death, is to reveal the essential nature of something, because as Blonsky says, “behavior can only be understood as the history of behavior”, it is only in movement that a body shows what it is. Historical study is not only an auxiliary to the object, but its true basis.

Historical Context of Transdisciplinarity

Transdisciplinarity emerges with the observation that there is a general tendency of sciences to be dialectical, but we feel that broader horizons are lacking and positivist science is unable to adequately interpret its results. Let's be honest: we are not accomplishing anything new, only recovering what has long been lost and distorted (catachresis), only when we not only repeat, but differentiate, forming a convolution formed in and for itself of the right and keeping in mind that we obtain and we obtained (reason) to elevate ourselves (ananke and/or anacresis); We trace the beginning of dichotomies in the Neolithic, and in fact, separation from oneself is a condition for evolution, for reunion in a higher articulated phase of experiences. But it is not just a restructuring of the sciences, but the creation of a new science: we are carrying out a movement of return (anamnesis, how to remember our nature and possibly how to actively differentiate new memories) and construction of the new (prolepsis). Because it is articulated within scientific dissent itself (even dissent from knowledge integration projects), transdisciplinarity is that immanence that points to transcendence, which overcomes itself and by itself. We are announcing a new historical phase, putting an end to the Neolithic. 

The meaning of Transdisciplinarity

Here the analogy can be drawn in different ways in the state of human comfort and how the human being tends to diverge from what surrounds him and then destroy it as an act of ignorance (kenosis). When we reach a point of recognition and create something based on what we are grounded in, in order to detach ourselves from the static ground, we are capable of movement (change, dynamism). Thinking about change, we can highlight some of them, from the scientific revolution, the philosophical revolution (Enlightenment), French revolution, socialist and communist revolution (the other side of capitalist societies), digital revolution (or the possibility of information discrepancy in relation to the continuous, a difference in relation to the analogue), and several others that occurred before our eyes in the interaction of a mind clouded by the collective (egalitarianism and informational multiplicity). It is not about forced freedom, nor about absolute certainty, nor just about schematization. It is a personal choice that comes with internalization, overcoming contingency to find continence in one's own action. Thinking (noesis), acting (praxis) and believing (gnosis) are fundamental to living the way we seek to exist in the first place. The scientific and philosophical revolution was instituted at a time of great church power, during the crusades in the name of religion and the concentration on the hieratic. With the rise of certain ideas, knowledge emerged that literally changed the currency with which the appearance of power was exchanged, leading to an economic shift. Skepticism, late atheism, logical, mathematical and scientific positivism then emerged, where the scientific method became a repetitive progression without a life of its own, just a constant appropriation.

In view of this, it is crucial to acquire purpose and apprehension as an argument of mutuality and concession, and to differentiate ourselves by imagining the conception of the other and its intricacies, the other being here this omnipresent particular, an argument of nature and spirit that is a temporal object, as well as every ephemerality scattered across the earth. It is important to become beings with limits bound by infinity, so that we can notice our deficiencies and qualities in continuous progress, facing pain and rain under a reason greater than ourselves, conceived throughout life and in function of it.

The disciplinary mechanization and of teaching centers conformed to new reductionist scientific standards, perpetuating logocentrism as a cultural and economic aspect. All of this became what it already was, but it happened unnoticed, leading to the emergence and recent marginalization of capitalism, which was once disguised as appropriation by the bourgeoisie (French revolution), the State (communist/socialist revolution), or by corporations/councils business (information revolution). All these points only gain dimension when connected, as if they were part of the same medium, among many already directed points/particles. 

The Transdisciplinar Ark Project

Our project aims to scale, consolidate and embody transdisciplinarity, as well as all the disciplines that will be present, making them acquire a non-local behavior (being a model for other disciplines as a delocalized science, without being separated from them), in addition to its abstract locality, perceiving its points of connection with the various variations and versions that resemble other theories or disciplines; in order to make them unique not only as an abstraction of themselves, a possible version of a composition of their own form, but as an emanation distant from the other, in order to create an ambivalent paradigm, where everyone is a model for everyone, an essential part of all theories and none at the same time.

The beginning, the future and the telos of the topics, all of this will be the reader's greatest duty, to locate themselves within our landscape. Next posts will introduce more of our proposals and the theories to be addressed by us, see that here everything is an argument of life under the prediction of our vain existences, so celebrate friends, for living, for acknowledging life (both arithmetically and aphoristically) .